OEE: overall equipment effectiveness, formula and example
OEE = Availability × Performance × Quality. It shows what share of planned time the equipment actually turns into good output at nominal speed and makes the “six big losses” visible.
What the metric measures
The effectiveness of a specific line/machine in terms of time, speed, and quality. It lets you compare shifts/lines, focus on the main types of losses, and justify TPM/SMED improvements.
Calculation
- OEE = Availability × Performance × Quality
- Availability = Run time / Planned production time
- Performance = (Ideal cycle time × Output) / Run time
- Quality = Good units / Output
- Derived metrics: OOE (based on available time), TEEP (based on 24/7 calendar time)
Agree on policies: what is included in planned time, how micro-stops are recorded, rework rules, and the reference ideal cycle time.
Calculation example
A shift is 480 min with 60 min of downtime: availability = 420 / 480 = 87.5%. In 420 min 840 parts should have been made, 714 were: performance = 85%. Of 714, 700 are good: quality = 98%. OEE = 0.875 × 0.85 × 0.98 = 72.9%.
Data sources
MES/SCADA/PLC (states, cycles), ERP/1C (plan/actual, standards), CMMS (repairs, MTBF/MTTR), quality systems (FPY/scrap), counters and speed sensors.
Interpretation
- Availability↓ — breakdowns, long setups, waiting for materials or QA
- Performance↓ — reduced speed, micro-stops, tooling/operating modes
- Quality↓ — startup/process defects, materials, calibration
- Tools: TPM, SMED, standard work, first-piece inspection
Useful breakdowns
- Line / machine / work area; shift / crew
- SKU / recipe / tooling
- Downtime types: breakdown, setup, waiting, QA hold
- Startup vs steady state; micro- vs major stops
Dashboard visualizations
- Time waterfall: calendar → planned → run time → effective output
- Pareto of losses across the “six big losses”
- Trend of OEE and its A/P/Q components by shift/line
- Micro-stop heatmap; speed vs reference chart
- MTBF/MTTR and defect map (FPY, defect types)
How to set targets
Define the reference ideal cycle time and accounting rules. Set targets for A/P/Q, pick the top 3 losses using Pareto, introduce daily plan-vs-actual reviews and corrective actions, and align with TPM and SMED.
Common mistakes
- Mixing planned and calendar time; a theoretical “ideal cycle time”
- Unrecorded micro-stops; rework counted as good
- Double counting of downtime; incorrect counters
- Policies not aligned across lines/shifts
Questions for discussion
- What is the biggest loss and its potential in pp of OEE?
- What effect would −30% setup at the bottleneck have?
- Where are the quick “speed losses,” and how can they be stabilized?
- What is the FPY target at the start of a shift, and how can it be achieved?