Spend share with key suppliers: concentration risks
Share of Spend with Key Suppliers shows what portion of procurement spend goes to an approved group of priority or top-N suppliers. It is a balance between economies of scale and the risk of dependence.
What the Metric Measures
The share of spend with key suppliers or the share of the top N (CR3/CR5/CR10) overall and by category (Kraljic), legal entity, and region.
Calculation
- Share with Key, % = Σ spend with key suppliers / Σ all spend × 100
- CRn = Σ spend with top-n suppliers / Σ all spend × 100
- HHI = Σ (supplier share)^2
- On-contract spend, % = Spend under contracts / All spend × 100
Agree on the spend source (invoices/GR/IR), period, currencies, consolidation of affiliated legal entities, and the criteria for "key" status.
Calculation example
Annual purchases are 30,000,000, of which 21,000,000 go to the three largest suppliers. Key supplier share = 21,000,000 / 30,000,000 × 100 = 70%, and the largest one alone is 40%. A supply failure there would hit 40% of purchases.
Data Sources
ERP/1C (POs, GR/IR, invoices), supplier and group master data, contract/catalog register, GL/accounting, category management module.
Interpretation
- High concentration — better terms and service, but greater dependence; dual-sourcing, SLAs, and contingency plans are needed
- Low concentration — less dependence, but higher transaction costs and weaker economies of scale
- Targets differ by category: strategic — controlled concentration; routine — consolidation
Useful Breakdowns
- Category / Kraljic; region; legal entity
- Supplier / group; currency; Incoterms
- Contract status; critical materials/SKUs
- Risk level (financial/ESG/geo)
Dashboard Visualizations
- Pareto of spend by supplier
- CR3/CR5/CR10 panel and HHI trend
- Dependence map by category
- Bubble chart: share vs. risk vs. service
- On-contract spend panel and single-source alerts
How to Set Targets
Approve the list of "key" suppliers and targets for CRn/HHI and on-contract (e.g., ≥80%). For strategic categories — at least two qualified sources or a backup plan; for routine ones — optimal consolidation.
Common Mistakes
- Calculating from POs instead of actual spend
- Mixing VAT/currencies and different periods
- Unconsolidated affiliated suppliers
- "Averaging" different categories without breakdowns
- Ignoring quality/OTIF and risks in decision-making
Questions for Discussion
- Who accounts for 80% of spend in each category, and why?
- Where is there excessive dependence, and what is the dual-sourcing plan?
- What will consolidating routine purchases and diversifying strategic items deliver?
- What is the on-contract share in critical categories?