Defect rate: formula, example and how to reduce it
The scrap/defect rate shows the share of unusable or defective products in output. Together with FPY/RTY, PPM/DPMO, and COPQ, it reflects the real impact of quality on margin, capacity, and OEE.
What the metric measures
The share of products/operations that do not meet specifications: final waste (scrap) and rework (rework). It makes it possible to find "hot spots" by line, shift, SKU, and cause.
Calculation
- Defect Rate, % = Defective units / All units × 100
- Scrap Rate, % = Unusable units written off / All units × 100
- FPY, % = Good units on the first pass / All units × 100
- RTY, % = Product of FPY across operations
- PPM = Defective units × 10⁶ / All units; DPMO — for multiple defect opportunities
- COPQ = Scrap + rework + returns + warranty costs + downtime
Agree on policies: what counts as a defect, how rework is accounted for, when it is recorded, and a single denominator (units/batches/hours).
Calculation example
12,000 parts were produced in a week and 300 rejected at inspection. Defect rate = 300 / 12,000 × 100 = 2.5%. At a unit cost of 150 the loss is 45,000 a week, not counting rework and delayed orders.
Data sources
QMS/ERP/1C (nonconformances, write-offs), MES/SCADA/PLC (defect events), quality systems (FPY/testing), CMMS (impact of downtime), WMS (batch quarantine), CRM/complaints.
Interpretation
- Scrap↑ — unstable process settings/tooling/materials, operator errors, startup defects after setup
- Rework↑ — hidden loss of capacity and rising cost of goods
- Assess process capability (Cp/Cpk) and the effect of TPM/SMED/DOE and standardization
Useful breakdowns
- Line / unit / shift / crew
- SKU / recipe / tooling; supplier / material batch
- Defect type (code), routing stage; internal / external / field
- "After setup" vs steady-state operation
Dashboard visualizations
- Trends in Scrap/Defect Rate, FPY/RTY
- Pareto chart of defect types and causes
- SPC p-/u-charts for stability
- Heatmap by line/shift/SKU; PPM/DPMO by supplier
- Correlation "after setup → scrap"
How to set targets
Set targets for FPY/PPM/DPMO and thresholds for CTQ; implement SPC, first-article inspection, a response SLA and RCA/CAPA processes, a batch quarantine policy, and regular updates of work instructions.
Common mistakes
- Confusing "defective units" with the "number of defects"
- Inconsistent denominator; counting rework as "good"
- No MSA (Gage R&R) or batch traceability
- Different rules across lines; ignoring defects found after shipment
Questions for discussion
- Which defect tops the Pareto chart, and what is the potential for reducing scrap?
- What effect will a 30% reduction in setup have on startup defects?
- Where is the weak link in inspection: MSA, frequency, or sampling point?
- What Cp/Cpk does the process have for critical CTQ?